A QUESTION THAT NEEDS AN ANSWER
I spend quite a bit of time reading news and views from a multitude of sources…thanks to the internet availability of news publications from all over the United States and the world as well. Some of my favorites from around the world are "Der Speigel" (Germany) the "Jerusalem Post" and a variety of news sites from Great Britain, who follow American issues almost as closely as they follow British ones. I think I have become much more widely read and informed since the advent of internet news sources and having been a "news junkies" for much of my adult life, reading the news and views from so many sources is most satisfying….as well as causing me a certain degree of consternation at times. It IS good for my news junkie-ness, though. I get that fully satisfied feeling every time I rise from my lenthy reading times.
There has been a question on my mind for a long time, especially since I regularly correspond with a cousin of mine who has very differing social and political views than I do. I have asked him the question that needs to be answered and so far I have not had a good answer from that source. The question I have asked him….a college campus Liberal all his adult life…is this: "Why are you so condescending toward my views?"
Recent reading on my many news sites has given me a somewhat clearer look into the question I have been asking for so long. Both views appeared in the venerable "Washington Post" and also appeared fairly close in time….last week to be exact…. but on different days. My question has also been, in a more general sense, "Why are Liberals so condescending toward Conservatives?"
Charles Krauthammer, in his weekly column, answered my question in his own way. Krauthammer answered by dealing with the fallout of the recent elections of Republicans in three eastern states…one (Massachussetts) a bastion of hard-rock liberalness and the others, New Jersey and Virginia , a definite turnaround from the elections of the most recent kind.(2008) In spite of the stunning upsets in all three states by Conservative candidates for 2 governors and 1 senator, I have heard various Liberals, including the President,attribute the Democratic defeats in those states to Americans being so angry over the 8 years of the Bush presidency. According to my own "personal source", it is another matter which both writers in the Washinton Post dealt with.
I must use a direct quote from one of the W.P. sources at this point in order to make my own point because I totally agree with the writer (Krauthammer) and he articulates it so much better than I can.
" A year later {after Obama’s inaugural address and his following speeches and legislative proposals} ..after stunning setbacks in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachussetts, Obama gave a stay-the-course- State of the Union address (a) pledging not to walk away from healthcare reform, (b) seeking to turn college education increasingly into a federal entitlement, and (c) asking again for cap and trade legislation. Plus, of course, another stimulus package, this time renamed a ‘jobs bill’. This being a democracy, don’t the Democrats see that clinging to this agenda will march them over a cliff? Don’t they understand Massachussetts? Well, they understand it through a prism of two cherished axioms: (1) The American people are stupid, and (2) Republicans are bad. Result? The dim , led by the malicious, vote incorrectly.
"Liberal expressions of disdain for the intelligence and emotional maturity of the electorate have been, post-Massachussetts, remarkably unguarded. New York Times columnist Charles Blow chided Obama for not understanding the necessity of speaking ‘in the plain words of plain folks’, because the people are suspicious of complexity. Counseled Blow: ‘The next time he gives a speech, someone should tap him on the ankle and say, ‘Mr. President, we’re down here.’ A "Time" magazine blogger was even more blunt about the ankle-dwelling mob, explaining that we are ‘a nation of dodos’ that is ‘too dumb to thrive.’ "
I began to understand the comments I have endured from my Liberal family member who has put down most comments I have shared with him regarding current political agendas and disasters. After the Massachussetts election I sent him, via mail, a quote from the third president of the U.S., Thomas Jefferson, which said "When ever things go so far wrong as to attract their notice, the people, if well informed, can be relied upon to set them to right." (Thomas Jefferson to Richard Price in 1789) My liberal cousin replied, (condescendingly) by part of the quote: "the people, if well informed" . To me it was a dismissal that the people of Massachussetts were certainly NOT well- informed. After all, Liberals know best and Liberals should be listened to—–listening to Conservative views where ever you find them, are certain signs that "we the people" are ignorant peasants and should be led by those who know what is right for us.
Krauthammer also made a point of the dramatic difference between what the current crop of Liberal Democrats in congress have said about Conservative opposition to Obama’s agenda: that being that Conservatives are "obstructionists" and have no offered no alternatives. That part about offering no alternatives is a blatant lie, of course but beyond that fact, when Democrats were in constant opposition to the agenda of George W. Bush, ie social security reform, and every action in Iraq….it was NOT obstructionism back then—–no… it was Noble Dissent, which they called "the highest form of patriotism" (quote Barack Obama as a senator who was one of the "dissenters’….certainly not an obstructionist.
"No more," said Krauthammer, in his Feb 5 essay published in that day’s edition of the Washington Post, "today, dissent from the governing orthodoxy is nihilistic malice."
But in the three states who overturned Liberal candidates and liberal agendad, it seems that the ankle-dwellers who cannot understand liberal complexities, are pushing back and will continue to push back, no matter what interpretation of their actions comes from the Condescending Liberals in Washington and other parts of our nation.
I believe Thomas Jefferson’s observation made in 1789 about the electorate is far wiser than anything we have heard as excuses for conservative election victories of the most recent past.
And I have my question answered. More, perhaps,later, about another writer, Gerard Alexander’s observations about Liberal Consdescension toward Conservatives.